Have you ever wondered why we are told that the Earth is a spinning ball, when our own senses and observations tell us otherwise? Have you ever questioned the validity of the so-called scientific evidence that supposedly proves the globe model? Have you ever seen the curvature of the Earth with your own eyes?

If you answered yes to any of these questions, you are not alone. There are millions of people around the world who have realized that the globe is a lie, and that the Earth is actually flat and stationary. In this blog post, I will show you some of the undeniable proofs that the Earth is flat, using simple geometry and common sense.

One of the most powerful proofs of the flat Earth is the lack of curvature over long distances. According to the globe model, the Earth has a radius of about 3,959 miles (6,371 km), which means that it has a curvature of about 8 inches per mile squared. This means that for every mile of distance, the surface of the Earth drops 8 inches, and the drop increases exponentially as the distance increases.

For example, at a distance of 10 miles, the curvature drop is about 66.6 feet (20.3 meters). At a distance of 100 miles, the curvature drop is about 6,666 feet (2,032 meters). And at a distance of 1,000 miles, the curvature drop is a staggering 666,666 feet (203,212 meters).

If the Earth was really a globe, we would not be able to see any objects beyond a certain distance, because they would be hidden behind the curvature. The horizon would be the point where the surface of the Earth curves away from our line of sight, and it would change depending on our height and the Earth’s radius.

However, this is not what we observe in reality. We can see objects much farther than the globe model allows, and the horizon is always flat and level, regardless of our height and the Earth’s radius. This proves that the Earth is not a globe, but a flat plane.

To illustrate this point, We will use some footage that was took in Santa Barbara, California, using a Nikon P900 camera with a powerful zoom lens. We set a camera to a low observation height of 1.5 feet (0.46 meters) off the ocean, and filmed some offshore oil platforms and an island that are supposed to be hidden by the curvature of the Earth.

The first two platforms that filmed are Platform Hill House and Platform Habitat. Platform Hill House is on the right, and it is 6.2 miles (10 km) away from my location. Platform Habitat is on the left, and it is 9.4 miles (15.1 km) away from my location.

According to the globe model, at an observation height of 1.5 feet and a distance of 6.2 miles, the curvature drop should be about 16.6 feet (5.1 meters), and the hidden height should be about 14.7 feet (4.5 meters). This means that Platform Hill House should be almost completely hidden behind the curvature, with only about 1.9 feet (0.6 meters) of its height visible above the horizon.

Similarly, at an observation height of 1.5 feet and a distance of 9.4 miles, the curvature drop should be about 31.4 feet (9.6 meters), and the hidden height should be about 28.1 feet (8.6 meters). This means that Platform Habitat should be totally hidden behind the curvature, with none of its height visible above the horizon.

However, as you can see from the footage, this is not the case. Both platforms are clearly visible in their entirety, with no sign of any curvature or obstruction. The horizon is many miles beyond the platforms, and it is perfectly flat and horizontal. This is impossible on a globe, but perfectly normal on a flat Earth.

The next platform that I filmed is Platform Grace, which is 18.9 miles (30.4 km) away from my location. According to the globe model, at an observation height of 1.5 feet and a distance of 18.9 miles, the curvature drop should be about 119.6 feet (36.4 meters), and the hidden height should be about 110.6 feet (33.7 meters). This means that Platform Grace should be completely hidden behind the curvature, with only about 9 feet (2.7 meters) of its height visible above the horizon.

However, as you can see from the footage, this is not the case. Platform Grace is clearly visible in its entirety, with no sign of any curvature or obstruction. The horizon is visible miles beyond Platform Grace, and it is perfectly flat and horizontal. This is impossible on a globe, but perfectly normal on a flat Earth.

The last object that I filmed is Arch Rock, which is a natural formation on Anacapa Island, which is 31.8 miles (51.2 km) away from my location. According to the globe model, at an observation height of 1.5 feet and a distance of 31.8 miles, the curvature drop should be about 267.9 feet (81.7 meters), and the hidden height should be about 253.4 feet (77.2 meters). This means that Arch Rock should be completely hidden behind the curvature, with none of its height visible above the horizon.

However, as you can see from the footage, this is not the case. Arch Rock is clearly visible in its entirety, with no sign of any curvature or obstruction. The horizon is visible miles beyond Arch Rock, and it is perfectly flat and horizontal. This is impossible on a globe, but perfectly normal on a flat Earth.

To make matters worse for the globe model, you can also see that the base of Arch Rock is higher than the base of Platform Grace, even though Arch Rock is farther away. This means that the Earth is not only flat, but also slightly concave, as the farther objects appear to be higher than the closer ones. This is consistent with the perspective laws of a flat plane, but contradictory to the geometry of a sphere.

To show you how absurd the globe model is, let’s do some simple calculations using the Pythagorean theorem. The Pythagorean theorem states that for a right triangle, the square of the hypotenuse (the longest side) is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides. In other words, a^2 + b^2 = c^2, where a and b are the shorter sides, and c is the hypotenuse.

We can use this theorem to find the radius of the Earth, given the distance to the horizon and the observation height. The formula is r = \\sqrt { (a + h)^2 – a^2}, where r is the radius of the Earth, a is the distance to the horizon, and h is the observation height.

Using this formula, we can find the minimum radius of the Earth that would allow us to see the horizon at a certain distance and height. For example, at an observation height of 1.5 feet and a distance of 6.2 miles, the minimum radius of the Earth would have to be 67,654 miles (108,862 km). This is more than 17 times larger than the official radius of the Earth.

Similarly, at an observation height of 1.5 feet and a distance of 9.4 miles, the minimum radius of the Earth would have to be 155,514 miles (250,306 km). This is more than 39 times larger than the official radius of the Earth.

At an observation height of 1.5 feet and a distance of 18.9 miles, the minimum radius of the Earth would have to be 628,690 miles (1,011,661 km). This is more than 158 times larger than the official radius of the Earth.

And at an observation height of 1.5 feet and a distance of 31.8 miles, the minimum radius of the Earth would have to be 1,584,000 miles (2,548,800 km). This is more than 400 times larger than the official radius of the Earth.

These numbers are ridiculous, and they show that the globe model is impossible. The Earth cannot be a sphere with such a small radius, and still allow us to see the horizon so far away. The only logical conclusion is that the Earth is not a globe, but a flat plane.

I hope this blog post has opened your eyes to the truth about the shape of the Earth, and the lies that we have been told by the authorities. The globe is insanity, and the flat Earth is reality.